Frankenstein Cloning Essay Example For Students

Frankenstein Cloning Essay The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of oneanother forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makethem all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, isethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implicationsof human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the RoslinInstitute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, butcompelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species resultsin harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issuesdealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning ofhuman beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and thatthe cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment forhuman needs. The possible physical damage that could be done if human cl oning became a reality isobvious when one looks at the sheer loss of life that occurred before the birth of Dolly. Less than ten percent of the initial transfers survive to be healthy creatures. Therewere 277 trial implants of nuclei. Nineteen of those 277 were deemed healthy while theothers were discarded. Five of those nineteen survived, but four of them died withinten days of birth of sever abnormalities. Dolly was the only one to survive (Fact: Adler1996). If those nuclei were human, the cellular body count would look like sheercarnage (Logic: Kluger 1997). Even Ian Wilmut, one of the scientists accredited withthe cloning phenomenon at the Roslin Institute agrees, the more you interfere withreproduction, the more danger there is of things going wrong (Expert Opinion). Thepsychological effects of cloning are less obvious, but none the less, very plausible. Inaddition to physical harms, there! are worries about the psychological harms on clonedhuman children. One of those harms is the loss of identity, or sense of uniqueness andindividuality. Many argue that cloning crates serious issues of ide ntity and individualityand forces humans to consider the definition of self. Gilbert Meilaender commented onthe importance of genetic uniqueness not only to the child but to the parent as wellwhen he appeared before the National Bioethics Advisory Commission on March 13,1997. He states that children begin with a kind of genetic independence of theparent. They replicate neither their father nor their mother. That is a reminder of theindependence that the parent must eventually grant themTo lose even in principlethis sense of the child as a gift will not be good for the children (Expert Opinion). Others look souly at the child, like philosopher Hans Jonas. He suggests that humanshave an inherent right to ignorance or a quality of separateness. Hum! an cloning, inwhich there is a time gap between the beginning of the lives of the earlier and latertwin, is fundamentally different from homozygous twins that are born at the same timeand have a simultaneous beginning of their lives. Ignorance of the effect of ones geneson ones future is necessary for the spontaneous construction of life and self (Jonas1974). Human cloning is obviously damaging to both the family of and the cloned child. It is harder to convince that non-human cloning is wrong and unethical, but it is justthe same. The cloning of a non-human species subjects them to unethical treatmentpurely for human needs (Expert Opinion: Price 97). Western culture and tradition haslong held the belief that the treatment of animals should be guided by different ethicalstandards than the treatment of humans. Animals have been seen as non feeling andsavage beasts since time began. Humans in general have no problem with seeinganimals as objects to be used whenever it becomes necessary. But what would happenif humans started to use animals as body for growing human organs? Where is the linedrawn between human and non human? If a primate was cloned so that it grew humanlungs, liver, kidneys, and heart., what would it then be? What if we were to learn howto clone functioning brains and have them grow inside of chimps? Would non-humanprimates, such as a chimpanzee, who carried one or more human genes via transgenictechnol ogy, be defined as still a chimp, a human, a subhuman, or something else? Ifdefined as human, would we have to give it rights of citizenship? And if humans were tocarry non-human transgenic genes, would that alter our definitions and treatment ofthem(Deductive Logic: Kluger 1997)? Also, if the technology were to be so thatscientists could transfer human genes into animals and vice-versa, that would heightenthe danger of developing zoonoses, diseases that are transmitted from animals tohumans. It could create a world wide catastrophe that no one would be able to stop(Potential Risks). In conclusion, the ethical and moral implications of cloning are suchthat it would be wrong for the human race to support or advocate it. The sheer loss oflife in both humans and non-humans is enough to prove that cloning would be a foolishendeavor, whatever the cause. .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .postImageUrl , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:hover , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:visited , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:active { border:0!important; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:active , .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u25167c3d3f6b9cee92cd328160c0a70e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Eminem EssayScience